<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tangled Rope &#187; chris lott</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tangledrope.org/tag/chris-lott/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tangledrope.org</link>
	<description>Untangling ideas in writing, literature, art, Western culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:36:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Motley Read Feb: Joyce&#8217;s &#8220;Dubliners&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://tangledrope.org/2010/02/01/motley-read-feb-joyces-dubliners/</link>
		<comments>http://tangledrope.org/2010/02/01/motley-read-feb-joyces-dubliners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>5tein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris lott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[february]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james joyce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motleyread]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tangledrope.org/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ll attempt to take advantage of Chris Lott&#8217;s invitation to join the Motley Readers this month as they work through James Joyce&#8217;s &#8220;Dubliners&#8221;. I say &#8220;attempt&#8221; not because I may be too motley for this crew (though that thought may surely cross some minds&#8211;especially after that pun), but to be realistic: I have once again [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll attempt to take advantage of <a href="http://cosmopoetica.com/blog/story/join-the-motley-reading-of-joyces-dubliners/">Chris Lott&#8217;s invitation</a> to join the <a href="http://motleyread.posterous.com/reading-joyces-dubliners-join-in-the-fun">Motley Readers</a> this month as they work through <a href="http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/2814">James Joyce&#8217;s &#8220;Dubliners&#8221;</a>. I say &#8220;attempt&#8221; not because I may be too motley for this crew (though that thought may surely cross some minds&#8211;especially after that pun), but to be realistic: I have once again taken on too large a pile for my limited abilities this semester, and so the pleasures of literature will be postponed as required.</p>
<p>In addition to a number of digital media for sharing reflections on our reading, one group member suggested physical post cards, mailed to any members of the group. Though I also intend to make a few meatier blog posts here, post cards grant a fine chance for me to send a little mail to friends, near strangers, and complete unknowns. When I do send post cards I think I will focus on darkest or brightest observation(s) in a given story, and may indulge my latent interest in art to sketch part of a story. I&#8217;m less excited to have my postcards be received than I am to see my postcards as part of a larger collection that Chris intends to compile.
</p>
<p>Regardless of how much I share during the month, I do plan to read all 15 stories, which means I need to tackle 4 a week, like this:</p>
<ol>
<li>&#8220;The Sisters&#8221;, &#8220;An Encounter&#8221;, &#8220;Araby&#8221;, &#8220;Eveline&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;After the Race&#8221;, &#8220;Two Gallants&#8221;, &#8220;The Boarding House&#8221;, &#8220;A Little Cloud&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;Counterparts&#8221;, &#8220;Clay&#8221;, &#8220;A Painful Case&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;Ivy Day in the Committee Room&#8221;, &#8220;A Mother&#8221;, &#8220;Grace, &#8220;The Dead&#8221;</li>
</ol>
<p>P.S. I was inclined to own the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dubliners-Norton-Critical-James-Joyce/dp/0393978516">Norton Critical Edition of &#8220;Dubliners&#8221;</a>, but opted for an edition that is hardbound, a little more compact and, for now, less intellectually overpowering. I just received my generally clean (though imprecisely described) Modern Library edition (1954 reprint) for the same price off of <a href="http://abebooks.com">ABE Books</a>:</p>
<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2798/4323649005_9226e75b7b.jpg" style="margin: 1.5em 0" alt="Dubliners 1954" /><br />
Not to get too far afield, but I like the economy of older Modern Library editions in general. In the case of &#8220;Dubliners&#8221; there are several printings. The first is a bit hard to find&#8211;indeed, I couldn&#8217;t find a copy that was intact, in good condition, not price-clipped, that was worth buying. The dust jacket on these early printings is more elegant than the 1954 printing which I settled for. There&#8217;s apparently an intermediate Modern Library edition printing bound in green (brown?) leatherette, but I couldn&#8217;t find an acceptable copy of that, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tangledrope.org/2010/02/01/motley-read-feb-joyces-dubliners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

